Billions of rows? Sounds like you'll need to rethink your design.
Sure you can do it, but how efficient will it be? > -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Troup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:55 AM > To: Derby Discussion > Subject: Limit on number of rows a table can hold? > > Hi, > > Is there a limit on the number of rows a table can hold? > I am planning on using derby as the RDBMS for a system that will > require tables to hold billions of rows. > > Thanks, Tim
