But we'd all like to know at what point it rolls over and dies :-)
There's a reason that Derby is free and Oracle, DB2 etc cost budko bucks.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Billions of rows?
Sounds like you'll need to rethink your design.
Sure you can do it, but how efficient will it be?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Troup [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:55 AM
To: Derby Discussion
Subject: Limit on number of rows a table can hold?

Hi,

Is there a limit on the number of rows a table can hold?
I am planning on using derby as the RDBMS for a system that will
require tables to hold billions of rows.

Thanks, Tim






--
A. Rick Anderson

Reply via email to