Hi David,
each machine has its own database(in embedded mode), distribution is
done via our application each machine holds roughly 20gb of data
Nurullah
On Feb 21, 2007, at 8:49 PM, David Van Couvering wrote:
Hi, Nurullah. You say that you spread the database over a bunch of
machines. Does that mean you're running multiple Derby instances,
each embedded into a process running on a different machine? Or do
you have one Derby instance that holds a 20gb table?
David
Nurullah Akkaya wrote:
i have a 20 gb table with over 100 million rows thats growing 1
million rows per day. i think it depends on what you trying to
achieve my application distributes a big database over a bunch of
machines so running a separate heavy server process was causing me
problems and switching derby saved a lot of resources and
application is much faster. but i am sure there is some body
else's application that will be much faster under DB2 or oracle.
Nurullah Akkaya
On Feb 20, 2007, at 2:54 PM, Tim Troup wrote:
Hi,
Is there a limit on the number of rows a table can hold?
I am planning on using derby as the RDBMS for a system that will
require tables to hold billions of rows.
Thanks, Tim
