Hey. > Since I'm running out of time, just a short reply :-) I'm going to start with: that's still an alot of things to ponder... Thank you for all this input, also on the buttons proposal -- I didn't even think of most of these scenarios (although they should have been fairly obvious). I'll try to address at least some of this in tomorrow or Tuesday in the wiki. By the way, I'm really preferring version 1 of these.
> Oh, I really liked your sketches! Here is something I've wrote about > last year: > http://uxopenofficeorg.blogspot.com/2010/05/picture-is-worth-thousand-words.html Hm, I am a bit wary of posting my handwriting on a wiki for all to see, because, while I like it, it is not always too clear. And also the Inkscape mock-up was done in the same spirit (at least I tried). > Oh, sorry, I haven't been clear enough here ... we have a great > documentation team, but nevertheless, such changes will have affect on: > internal/wiki help, external documentation, training material ... in > almost 100 languages ... and also the training effort (in companies). > And that's the real issue - and that's what requires to be very careful > about change affecting many users. Ugh. When you have more time later, would you mind explaining how careful we have to be? I'm a bit unsure, for instance: are wording changes easy to take care of (just search and replace some words in all documents)? What is a careful interaction change? >> * this mock-up doesn't use "AutoCorrect", but rather something that I Ouch. That should of course mean "AutoUpdate"... >> hope is more digestable: "automatically update this style when >> formatting is changed directly" (I suppose the wording could still be >> improved) > > True, already improved ... :-) But, at some point we have to keep two > things in mind (don't worry, let's first discuss the behavioral and > structural changes): > * there is an OOo styleguide how UI / help texts should be written > (to be consistent throughout LibreOffice) I tried googling for it, is this the right document/version? http://specs.openoffice.org/collaterals/guides/text-style-guide.html > * we are heavily affected by the size of the dialogs, since > English is a rather "compact" language, but the dialog size has > to reserve space for other languages (rule of thumb: English > +40...60% space) --> we really need a layout manager, grrr I see there's something making you rather less happy^^. From your experience, is it feasible to leave some blank space under that line so that text can flow more freely or would that look unprofessional? In this case, I'm unsure, how to, after leaving out the "that," the idea can be put in a more compact way -- unless one wants an Auto-ism as before. > >> * the field "Contains" is replaced by a more ordered and professional >> looking list, from which single items can be selected and removed > Using the list alone is a great improvement already :-) I'd hoped that. > How about moving the "Inherits from" above the "Style defines", then it > might be clearer how "inheritance" works?. Not sure. Since really, it is a relation to another style. I don't think these should be important enough to warrant putting them above the actual definition of the style. And also, I tried to keep it somehow in order in the Refererences grouping (General type of class, Base class, Followed-by class -- although I just see that this hierarchy isn't really one at all). But I'm fairly sure that changing that text again to "based upon" will not only translate better but also communicate more clearly. I also think that "[this] style defines[:]" is not very good wording, but I left it because the current "contains" or "definitions" seemed worse. > Great work, really! I'm sorry that my time is so limited at the moment, > so my support is rather limited ... so please feel free to point out > things you might need help with / comments / moral support ;-) Thank you. You've brought up many important things here already. Regards, Astron. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
