On 06/03/2012 11:25 AM, Mirek M. wrote:
2012/6/3 Jean-Francois Nifenecker<[email protected]>
Le 31/05/2012 21:29, Kohei Yoshida a écrit :
There is another reason for that. Document not only store its content
but also view properties, but a change in the view properties doesn't
trigger a document modified status. Here, view properties include
things like (in case of spreadsheet) active sheet, cursor position, zoom
level etc.
But quite often you want to store the view properties after they've
changed, and always enabling the save action allows this. Disabling the
save action when the document content is unchanged even though the view
has changed is IMO quite unfriendly in this regard.
Also, it's IMO wrong to trigger a document modified status on view
change.
I beg to differ.
A document is either changed and needs saving or is not and... doesn't.
Conversely, if changing a property needs saving, then the document *is*
changed.
+1
It's not a matter of opinion, but of technicality. Any software that
deals with complex documents is designed this way, and that's not going
to change it.
Not to mention changing this principle would basically means that you
are writing a new app from scratch, since everything else is built on
this principle in our code base. I for one am not interested in such
effort.
That's all I have to say. If people still don't see my point after
this, then I suggest we agree to disagree, and avoid further wasting
time on this topic.
Peace,
Kohei
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
