Hi Patrick, thanks for caring about LO and for bringing yourself in. This is much welcome!
Concerning your suggestion I am sorry, but I have to be more direct: IMHO it makes no sense in the context of LO: - Most undo-actions in LO will affect only very few last actions, while the concept makes undo of numerous actions easy. - The concept makes it even harder to precisely undo only the last action than it is at the moment. - The design will spoil the current interface concept of LO (and actually a complete redesign of it is simply not on the agenda right now) There might be applications the idea works with, but i cannot see it embedded in LO right now. But as always: I am more than happy to be proven wrong. ;) Hope you will continue to join the team - even though the initial reaction might not be as positive as you might have hoped! We really appreciate your input! Cheers, Björn Am Montag, 2. Juli 2012, 13:10:09 schrieb Sveinn í Felli: > I'm really hesitating towards this. Most applications I know > of, which offer stepping directly into a level in an command > sequence (undo history), those mostly do it via a drop-down > menu. Sometimes this drop-down menu is called by click-hold > action similar to the back-button action in many browsers. > IMHO that would be the way to go. > > Best regards, > > Sveinn í Felli > > Þann mán 2.júl 2012 00:56, skrifaði Kévin PEIGNOT: > > Hi ! > > > > I love the idea ! Then I think we still need a way to go back easily, just > > for "one action", like if we made just a Ctrl+Z. Maybe this can be done by > > resistancy in the slider or buttons on the extremity (undo button on the > > left, redo button on the right). > > > > For me (correct me if I'm wrong) : > > - This is just for the toolbar (almost impossible to implement in the menu > > - This might take a lot of horizontal space, How could we minimize this > > effect ? > > > > Kévin > > > > 2012/7/1 pakohan <patrick.ko...@googlemail.com> > > > >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOaTkxGWpyA > >> > >> Here is a video which should demonstrate what I mean. > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Idea-for-an-new-Undo-Redo-Function-t > >> p3993164p3993170.html Sent from the Design mailing list archive at > >> Nabble.com. > >> > >> -- > >> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org > >> Problems? > >> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > >> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > >> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ > >> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > >> deleted -- www.OpenUsability.org www.OpenSource-Usability-Labs.com -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
