Hi Issa, On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Issa Alkurtass <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hello Kévin, all, > > Thank you for the updates. Before I reply on your comments I like to > propose an idea similar to Mirek's for the palette tab: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:I_colorpicker_palettes.png > Multiple palettes for the ability to choose colors digitally, without > moving any sliders or pointers. It helps users look at multiple colors at > once and choose between them. > If we allow custom palettes (which we definitely should if we have a palette view), then it'd be good to have a drop-down list of the palettes rather than a spatial view, or we could have both (a drop-down with left+right arrows at the side). > > Kévin PEIGNOT wrote on March 17, 2013 8:23 PM: > ><Issa> New should be on the left and Old on the right. > > I don't really see why (for me, history (old) is on the left, > future > >(new) on the right) but it's done; > > Because New is the more important one and the one that will be updated. I > feel that it is natural for it to be there (it is even implemented that way > in the color map). > Usually it's top/bottom for New/Old in most programs though. Maybe we > should find a way to do that? > My thoughts on that in the last mail. I'd prefer to keep the color previews in a single row. > > ><Issa> The colors beneath the basic ones should be even to clear > >confusion about the gap between the third and fourth rows (to show that > >the third isn't the middle color). > > What I meant is that the number of color aside from the first should be an > even number (2, 4, etc.) because the middle shade was already removed to > the top. Something like this (lower numbers represent brighter colors): > [3] > --- //gap > [1] > [2] > [4] > [5] > The color selection is identical to that in MS Office. It's not a requirement, but it's good for compatibility purposes (e.g. if a user loads an MS Office document and wants to reuse one of the color variants), so I'd keep it the way it is. > > >-Wouldn't it be better if we use a color map/square for the HSL instead > >of the wheel since it's already implemented and prettier in my opinion? > > Personally I prefer the wheel. Then I'm not sure what would be > the good > >choice. > > Maybe we should have a voting then to see what most people think :) > A vote isn't a reliable way to discover what's best for the user. A usability study, perhaps based on Inkscape, which includes views for both sliders and a wheel, would be much more accurate. Perhaps we should invite Bjorn Balazs to help us with that? > > >- When using the standard colors as the default theme, what would appear > >in the palette tab ? > > I think this shouldn't happen : the palette is there to present > >majority of colors, the theme present colors that fit well together. The > >default theme should be something else,that we will define. It have to > >be pretty has lot of people (in M$ Office at least, since it's not > >horrible) use the default one. But for me, the palette is fixed. > > Fair enough. Maybe we can even use LibreOffice branding theme or Tango > theme as the default. > The branding theme should be used for marketing purposes only. I was originally thinking we could use Tango as well, but some of the colors look quite bad when they're used in documents, especially the greens, so I'd rather opt for something we make ourselves, something that we know looks good on any background and in various use cases (text, shapes, graphs, tables, ...). -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
