Hi Sophie, Sophie píše v Út 16. 12. 2014 v 16:57 +0100:
> Discussing with QA team today, there has been a lot of bug reports > concerning minor enhancements these last days. > It would be better is those enhancements would be first discussed by the > UX team before going to QA for triage because most of the time they > don't have the requested info regarding bug filling then QA team has to > spend a lot of time to reproduce them and this is not up to the QA team > to discuss UX enhancements. Please can you send few examples to have a better idea? :-) Asking because: > So it would be much more efficient for both teams to: > - first discuss the enhancement here or on redmine (I don't know your > process :) If it is something small that is obviously the right thing to do (like some wording fix or so) - then it would be awesome to encourage the reporter to fix it himself / herself & send a patch via gerrit. If it is something bigger, then sending the bug id here to the ML is OK of course; or add it to the weekly hangout agenda, so that we discuss it there. > - then fill a RFE when it's consolidated with all the needed info for > the QA team > - let the UX team confirm it quickly so it goes out the QA review > process and stats. I'd say - either confirm (if the idea sounds interesting), or close as wontfix ;-) Thanks a lot, kendy -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
