Hello everyone, I don't know this so it might be a somewhat silly question. Within the ODF spec are there mandatory fonts that have to be supported by all implementations? I see zero reason to embed additional fonts if this is the case except for if you have purposely saved in a font that is required for interoperability. Even then isn't there a concept of a "default" fall back position? Kind regards, John
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 at 9:51 am, Stéphane Guillou<stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> wrote: Hi all On 22/12/2023 10:15, Eyal Rozenberg wrote: > The font embedding is an example of a deeper issue: > > If LibreOffice is a 'native' ODT editor; > and if you open an ODT in it; > and if you don't effect any changes in that ODT, but just save; > is it legitimate for the resulting ODT to be in any way different than > the original (other than meta-data regarding modification date etc.) ? > I think it might be legitimate in various cases. One example I can think of is how fileopen checks on a few things depending on what the user has or doesn't have, notably linked files and images. I think there's some similarity: fonts might get embedded if the file properties ask to do it, depending on the font's availability on the system it is opened on. Do you think there should be feedback to the user when such a thing happens? (e.g. a message saying "Font XYZ found, embedding it into the file. See File > Properties > Fonts to change that option."). And why would you save the file in the first place, if you haven't changed anything? Sorry if I'm missing the point :) > > On 22/12/2023 9:11, Heiko Tietze wrote: >> On 21.12.23 20:05, Eyal Rozenberg wrote: >>> "LibreOffice unexpectedly and strangely modifies an ODT file without >>> they user having done anything, and embedding unnecessary fonts nobody >>> asked it to." >> >> Sounds like another facet of the font embedding. I would treat bug >> 158588 about what fonts are embedded (CTL/CJK/Lat and used) and handle >> the situation of shared documents on another. I haven't tested what >> happens when one checks the embed fonts option and shares this document >> with another person. Assuming her fonts would also be included, >> silently, this is at least a privacy issue. >> Just curious, what concrete privacy concerns do you see here? But maybe the "notification" I suggested above would be enough to make the change transparent and the user aware. Cheers -- Stéphane Guillou Quality Assurance Analyst | The Document Foundation Email: stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org Matrix: @stragu:matrix.org Fediverse: @str...@mastodon.indie.host Web: https://stragu.gitlab.io/ -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
