The label being grayed out is important. The outline being closer to white also helps a lot, but as you said, when it's alone the outline change is not enough. I think the gray fill is still a little dark, maybe use #f5f5f5 if you can swing it, but B is getting close.
- Trevor On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:03 PM, May Tee-Galloway <[email protected]> wrote: > I made a few of variations to compare. I think B works the best because it > doesn't look like you can do anything about it. I greyed the text out, just > like what happens to disabled buttons > <http://tools.wmflabs.org/styleguide/desktop/section-2.html>. > > If A and C stood alone without the standard checkbox, they may not be as > clear that they're disabled. Is there a reason we're using lightgrey > instead of actual value? > > [image: Inline image 2] > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'm confident she will come up with something sensible. >> >> - Trevor >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jared Zimmerman < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Trevor, thanks, thats looking closer. I'll let may weigh in before we >>> finalize. >>> >>> >>> >>> *Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia >>> Foundation >>> M +1 415 609 4043 \\ @jaredzimmerman <http://loo.ms/g0> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> This is what it looks like when the checkbox uses #ddd instead of " >>>> lightgrey" and the surrounding .mw-ui-checkbox div is 50% transparent. >>>> >>>> - Trevor >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe it's just me, but the new disabled checkbox doesn't look >>>>> disabled to me: >>>>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/styleguide/desktop/section-5.html >>>>> >>>>> The normal convention for making a form element disabled is to make it >>>>> faded out (<100% opacity), not giving it a gray fill. >>>>> >>>>> I have no idea where this design came from or who is responsible for >>>>> it, but I was wondering if the design team could revisit it. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Ryan Kaldari >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Design mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Design mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Design mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Design mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Design mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design > >
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
