I really like it. The #ccc outline, #f9f9f9 fill and #ccc text looks great.
- Trevor On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:10 PM, May Tee-Galloway <[email protected]> wrote: > I was looking for a background color that has as little contrast as > possible with #CCC. Important to have the border show but not dark enough > that when it stands alone, it looks like an active checkbox. I made a > version with #F9F9F9. What do you guys think? > [image: Inline image 1] > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I recommend using @colorDisabledText for the label, and @colorGray15 for >> the fill. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jon Robson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> MediaWiki UI already has the current grays defined. According to current >>> spec colour gray 12 (#ccc) is used for disabled text. >>> >>> @colorGray1: #111; // darkest >>> @colorGray2: #222; >>> @colorGray3: #333; >>> @colorGray4: #444; >>> @colorGray5: #555; >>> @colorGray6: #666; >>> @colorGray7: #777; >>> @colorGray8: #888; >>> @colorGray9: #999; >>> @colorGray10: #AAA; >>> @colorGray11: #BBB; >>> @colorGray12: #CCC; >>> @colorGray13: #DDD; >>> @colorGray14: #EEE; >>> @colorGray15: #F9F9F9; // lightest >>> >>> @colorDisabledText: @colorGray12; >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Trevor Parscal <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> The label being grayed out is important. The outline being closer to >>>> white also helps a lot, but as you said, when it's alone the outline change >>>> is not enough. I think the gray fill is still a little dark, maybe use >>>> #f5f5f5 if you can swing it, but B is getting close. >>>> >>>> - Trevor >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 12:03 PM, May Tee-Galloway < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I made a few of variations to compare. I think B works the best >>>>> because it doesn't look like you can do anything about it. I greyed the >>>>> text out, just like what happens to disabled buttons >>>>> <http://tools.wmflabs.org/styleguide/desktop/section-2.html>. >>>>> >>>>> If A and C stood alone without the standard checkbox, they may not be >>>>> as clear that they're disabled. Is there a reason we're using lightgrey >>>>> instead of actual value? >>>>> >>>>> [image: Inline image 2] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Trevor Parscal < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm confident she will come up with something sensible. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Trevor >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Jared Zimmerman < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Trevor, thanks, thats looking closer. I'll let may weigh in before >>>>>>> we finalize. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Jared Zimmerman * \\ Director of User Experience \\ Wikimedia >>>>>>> Foundation >>>>>>> M +1 415 609 4043 \\ @jaredzimmerman <http://loo.ms/g0> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Trevor Parscal < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is what it looks like when the checkbox uses #ddd instead of " >>>>>>>> lightgrey" and the surrounding .mw-ui-checkbox div is 50% >>>>>>>> transparent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Trevor >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Ryan Kaldari < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe it's just me, but the new disabled checkbox doesn't look >>>>>>>>> disabled to me: >>>>>>>>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/styleguide/desktop/section-5.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The normal convention for making a form element disabled is to >>>>>>>>> make it faded out (<100% opacity), not giving it a gray fill. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I have no idea where this design came from or who is responsible >>>>>>>>> for it, but I was wondering if the design team could revisit it. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>>> Ryan Kaldari >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Design mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Design mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Design mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Design mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Design mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Design mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Design mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Design mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Design mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design > >
_______________________________________________ Design mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/design
