On 1/5/07, Mimi Yin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well a different way to look at it is, the pre-existing calendar helps the user understand what Cosmo is. It's disconcerting to sign- up and log into something that is blank and be immediately confronted with options. Exploring the UI then becomes this thing that the user has to actively do, rather than something the user just falls into because they're provided with an inviting calendar canvas to play with, right off the bat.
i think this is true for people who want to use cosmo standalone, but i don't think it's at all true for casual collaborators or for chandler users who just want web access to their shared collections. i don't think you need a pre-created calendar to upsell cc's. i think it makes more sense to tell the cc "see this calendar somebody shared with you? here's how you can have one of your own" _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
