Are you talking about in Cosmo or in Chandler? I thought you were
talking about Cosmo.
On Feb 2, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
Heh, do you have another suggestion?
I mean in the future we potentially have all kinds of accounts:
+ Email (accounts)
+ IM (accounts)
+ Voice (accounts)
+ Amazon (accounts)
+ .Mac (accounts)
+ Exchange (accounts)
etc...
I don't think we want to be talking about VoIP versus SIP. We want
to say voice and then have a list of clients to choose from. (Yes I
realize, voice clients also do IM and chat and whatnot. Sigh.)
Oh, I think the current proposal is to call it just Sharing. You
don't actually choose between Cosmo Sharing and WebDAV per se.
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Journal/AccountSetupWorkflow
Mimi
On Feb 2, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Bobby Rullo wrote:
+ Outlook also provides 2 different ways to Publish/Share. 1
within the Windows Live network. (Although it doesn't say that
anywhere in the description, it's called Office Online instead.)
And a second via WebDAV. What's WebDAV? (We have this option
too :o( I wonder if we could call it 'Sharing Server' instead.)
If you did that, then instead of just technology-savvy people
understanding what you were talking about, no one would.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
