I think that's where I would prefer to have it be something more
'concrete' than WebDAV. e.g. specific services/destinations (e.g.
Flickr) that users understand. That being said, there will also be a
place for identifying accounts by technology, probably in an advanced
area. I think the model we have today for the 'Subscribe' pulldown is
a good place to start. We listed a few of the most 'likely' clients
users can subscribe with, that we support and then have an advanced
area for users using other clients who are can figure how to
subscribe for themselves.
Mimi
On Feb 5, 2007, at 10:31 AM, Bobby Rullo wrote:
I see. The main way that cosmo and chandler will talk in the future
will be a new protocol - not WebDAV. So that's the one you would
call Sharing Server or "Cosmo Server" or "Chandler Server" or
whatever else we coem up with.
However, if you offer the ability to share to a generic WebDAV
server you must call it WebDAV somewhere. Same goes for stuff in
the Cosmo collection details dialog box - if you offer certain
protocols to be used they must be called by their real names
somewhere.
On Feb 5, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:
For now, Chandler. But I can see for both eventually.
On Feb 2, 2007, at 3:55 PM, Bobby Rullo wrote:
Are you talking about in Cosmo or in Chandler? I thought you were
talking about Cosmo.
On Feb 2, 2007, at 3:32 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
Heh, do you have another suggestion?
I mean in the future we potentially have all kinds of accounts:
+ Email (accounts)
+ IM (accounts)
+ Voice (accounts)
+ Amazon (accounts)
+ .Mac (accounts)
+ Exchange (accounts)
etc...
I don't think we want to be talking about VoIP versus SIP. We
want to say voice and then have a list of clients to choose
from. (Yes I realize, voice clients also do IM and chat and
whatnot. Sigh.)
Oh, I think the current proposal is to call it just Sharing. You
don't actually choose between Cosmo Sharing and WebDAV per se.
http://wiki.osafoundation.org/Journal/AccountSetupWorkflow
Mimi
On Feb 2, 2007, at 3:20 PM, Bobby Rullo wrote:
+ Outlook also provides 2 different ways to Publish/Share. 1
within the Windows Live network. (Although it doesn't say that
anywhere in the description, it's called Office Online
instead.) And a second via WebDAV. What's WebDAV? (We have
this option too :o( I wonder if we could call it 'Sharing
Server' instead.)
If you did that, then instead of just technology-savvy people
understanding what you were talking about, no one would.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
