I agree with Davor. It seems to me this behavior may discourage Chandler users from collaborating with the "casual collaborator" type users of Cosmo. In a sense, inserting some separation between the preview of Cosmo from the preview of Chandler. Bad weather in the ecosystem, so to speak.
Andre On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:33:04 -0800, "Davor Cubranic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Mimi Yin wrote: > > + Is it a problem that Cosmo won't have conflict resolution UI and > > won't have a way to 'quarantine' conflicting pending changes? In other > > words, whatever changes the Cosmo user makes will overwrite anything > > any Chandler user has synced to the server in the meantime. > Uh, this sounds like bad news... > > Davor > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design -- Andre Mueninghoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
