Morgen's explanation was my understanding also, that the last update in time order wins.
On a related note and likely a conversation for another day, it occurs to me that it might be useful to be able to "disconnect" an attribute from updates by other people via sync. For example, for a particular item, I want the title to have some additional keywords or something meaningful to only me, so I want to be able to receive updates to all other attributes for this item from the people with whom I am sharing this item, except for the title. Andre On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:09:37 -0800, "Morgen Sagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Mimi Yin wrote: > > > > 3. However, Chandler users wouldn't have their local changes > > automatically overwritten by Cosmo Casual Collaborators. Instead, > > Cosmo changes would get stored as Pending Changes and the Chandler > > user would decide whether or not to apply them. > > This is not the case. If the Chandler user changes the title of an > event and syncs, and then the Cosmo UI user happens to also change > the title of that same event, the next time Chandler syncs it will > get the whatever title the Cosmo user set. The Cosmo-side change > will not be considered a pending conflict by Chandler because > Chandler had already sent its local changes during the first sync. > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list > http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design -- Andre Mueninghoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
