Morgen, is this taking into consideration what we plan to do with
conflict resolution? Or is this how it works today?
My understanding was that if the Chandler user syncs their changes
and then pulls down conflicting changes from the server, the local
edits won't get wiped away.
Mimi
On Feb 8, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 9:58 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:
3. However, Chandler users wouldn't have their local changes
automatically overwritten by Cosmo Casual Collaborators. Instead,
Cosmo changes would get stored as Pending Changes and the Chandler
user would decide whether or not to apply them.
This is not the case. If the Chandler user changes the title of an
event and syncs, and then the Cosmo UI user happens to also change
the title of that same event, the next time Chandler syncs it will
get the whatever title the Cosmo user set. The Cosmo-side change
will not be considered a pending conflict by Chandler because
Chandler had already sent its local changes during the first sync.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
