Sorry I realized I was mixing terms in my e-mail. There will be some
getting used to on my part, please note when I say: Cosmo/Cosmo UI =
Chandler Hub.
Thanks, -Priscilla
On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Priscilla Chung wrote:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 10:25 AM, Brian Moseley wrote:
yes, but that's not the point of contention, really. this was how
we'd
originally suggested things work, but you guys explicitly told us to
continue to show the non-logged-in "ticket view" of the collection
even when the browser is already logged in to the app.
If I remember the issue correctly, the problem we were discussing
at the time was if a user clicks on the bookmarkable URL and they
are logged into Cosmo, the user may not necessarily want to
subscribe to that collection. So then Chandler Hub would have to
display some 'temporary ID' on the collection within the drop down
list.
I don't believe we ever touched on the issue of the user already
logged into Cosmo and have already subscribed to the collection in
their account.
i think that when somebody clicks the pim/sharing url for a
collection, if their browser is logged into cosmo already and the
user
is already subscribed to the collection, they should just get
redirected to the regular logged-in calendar view
(/cosmo/pim/calendar) with that particular collection selected.
+1
-Priscilla
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
