Response/comment below.

Mimi Yin wrote:
The only disadvantage of Yes/No dialog buttons is that if the buttons
 themselves are descriptive, than users don't need to read the dialog
 text. So as a rule, I've been trying to avoid Yes/Not buttons in
dialogs on the Desktop. (Although admittedly, the message you have is
pretty short.)

I actually tried in my e-mail yesterday to write a sensible
prompt/button combination that used Yes/No instead of action words, because I was initially thinking it might actually be less confusing. But I couldn't come up with wording that made it clear what would happen when clicking each of the buttons.

And now, thinking on it further -- it seems like there are really three options:

1. Save the changes to the server.
2. Ignore the changes and change the contents of the form to the new selection. 3. Cancel the action and return back to the form to verify what the changes are before deciding whether or not to save.

May be overkill -- but users may not be totally sure *what* changes they made, and want to double-check the form before keeping the changes or throwing them out.

I hate it when the UI forces me to make destructive changes (e.g. save or throw out my changes) if I'm not totally sure what I've done.

Thoughts?


Matthew






_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

Reply via email to