Yeah, that's why I was saying that anything that buys us breathing space
there is a good thing. I don't know if it's a slippage risk though --
more a usability risk because that description field is getting small,
and we know people hate typing lengthy text in tiny boxes. :)
Mikeal Rogers wrote:
Now that I am actually going to check for myself -- it looks like the
current, non-collapsible design does not actually fit in 1024x768
resolution in a default Firefox install, because of the addition of
the tabs. Looks like it still just barely fits in IE7. That stuff is
already getting pretty compressed in there -- but I'm guessing our
solution there would be to shave down the description field even more?
Can one of the designers comment on this for me?
When we are this tight for space should we consider it a potential risk
for slippage when fixing issues we find down the road?
-Mikeal
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
