On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 11:38, Brian Nitz wrote: > Do we know what level of accessibility is possible within the current > mono framework?
I can't speak to "possible". I would assume that with significant engineering resources it could be achieved. If the existing mono apps all use gtk# to create their GUIs, it might be reasonably straightforward. Otherwise it might take multiple-engineer-years. I haven't run mono/GTK# apps to see whether they export any ATK support already, perhaps the mono team can answer this? > Do we know what level of accessibility is likely (e.g. with C# apps > ported from other platforms?) If they don't use GTK#, I assume the answer is effectively "none". Bill > Bill Haneman wrote: > > Federico said: > > > > > >> Big tangent: the "GNOME Certification" plan will help in defining what > >> is a "good GNOME application" and what isn't. That certification will > >> include things like consistent look&feel [insert a lot of handwaving > >> about how to quantify this...] > >> > > > > /me points to > > Gnome Accessibility Guide For Developers, > > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/guide/gad , and > > Testing Gnome Applications for Accessibility: > > http://developer.gnome.org/projects/gap/testing/index.html > > > > > > Bill > > > > > >> Federico > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> Message: 5 > >> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 01:07:57 +0200 > >> From: Philip Van Hoof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: Re: [Evolution-hackers] Memory consumption and virtual > >> machines > >> To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > >> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >> > >> On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 16:05 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 14:46 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > >>> > >>> I've been talking to Philip on IRC, and gave him these requirements for > >>> his patch: > >>> > >>> 1. Don't change the external ABI of Camel, so that Evo needs no changes, > >>> *OR* also submit a patch to update Evo for the changed API. > >>> > >> Achieved > >> > >> > >>> 2. Make sure the summary format on disk works with older Evos without > >>> making *them* rewrite the summaries. This is for deployments which have > >>> machines with old and new versions of GNOME, but NFS homedirs accessible > >>> from any machine. > >>> > >> Achieved my renaming all the summary filenames > >> > >> > >>> 3. Keep the coding style, variable naming convention, indentation, etc. > >>> > >> Done > >> > >> > >> For you, attached and on a plate: > >> > >> o. The patch for evolution-data-server > >> o. The patch for evolution-exchange > >> > >> > >> Trying to get this upstream is, for me, saying thank you. > >> > >> Looking at the patch technically AND testing it (and if it doesn't > >> perform, giving me numbers that compare it with the original implement- > >> ation) is all I'm asking for. > >> > >> If Novell wants me to implement unit tests (or other tests) for this, I > >> will ask for payment. > >> > >> -- > >> Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend > >> home: me at pvanhoof dot be > >> gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org > >> work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be > >> http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >> Name: evolution_data_server__mmap_summary.diff.gz > >> Type: application/x-gzip > >> Size: 14012 bytes > >> Desc: not available > >> Url : > >> /archives/desktop-devel-list/attachments/20060719/9407295b/attachment.bin > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >> Name: evolution_exchange__mmap_summary.diff.gz > >> Type: application/x-gzip > >> Size: 871 bytes > >> Desc: not available > >> Url : > >> /archives/desktop-devel-list/attachments/20060719/9407295b/attachment-0001.bin > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> desktop-devel-list mailing list > >> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > >> > >> End of desktop-devel-list Digest, Vol 27, Issue 65 > >> ************************************************** > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list