On Mon, 2006-07-24 at 20:48 -0700, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote: > Ok, I am confused then... If GTK# is already modular as you claim and if > Mike is willing to offer a migration path for his current apps, I don't see > why all this discussion is taking place... There should not be any technical > reason left as to why GTK# shouldn't be in the bindings release.
Because it's only half true. Three of the desktop libs (vte, rsvg, and gtkhtml) are optional and built into their own assemblies. The other three (print/printui/panelapplet) are built into gnome-sharp.dll along with the rest of the bound Gnome namespace. -- Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
