On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 18:21 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > gtk-sharp-2.10.0 would keep glib-sharp, pango-sharp, atk-sharp, > > gdk-sharp, gtk-sharp, glade-sharp, and gtkdotnet. I would propose this > > altered package for inclusion in the Bindings release set. > > That seems a lot nicer. > > I am, however, slightly concerned that this would force people to depend > on libglade even when we have a libglade replacement in GTK+. The C, C > ++, Python, Java, and Perl users will be able to rewrite their > applications so that they don't need libglade on the system.
glade-sharp is an optional build. We're not forcing anyone to put it on their systems. -- Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
