On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 17:47 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > > gtk-sharp-2.10.0 would keep glib-sharp, pango-sharp, atk-sharp, > > gdk-sharp, gtk-sharp, glade-sharp, and gtkdotnet. I would propose this > > altered package for inclusion in the Bindings release set. > > (I don't know what's in gtkdotnet, but I suppose it's stuff to make it > easier to use gtk+)
Stuff to allow drawing on Gdk windows with the .Net System.Drawing API. Any future additions will be of a similar flavor. Helper classes for access to .Net APIs for which we don't want to put an additional dependency on gtk-sharp.dll. > > The division should satisfy all the rules. There is no rule against a > > platform binding living in the Desktop release set. > > This looks like it would work. gnome-vfs-sharp, gnome-sharp and > gconf-sharp could go in the bindings suite too, but this would imply > either creating a third package or moving them in gtk-sharp-2.10.0. Putting all the gnome stuff in one gnome-sharp package has a certain marketability/sense to it. And gnome-sharp can't go in platform. It's the source of all this angst, because it has the dreaded print and panel APIs. -- Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
