> > Ter, 2006-09-12 às 14:26 -0400, Hubert Figuiere escreveu: > > Why not? The language and needed dependencies, including runtime, is just an > other > parameter of teh software. What'sw wrong with disliking Mono or Python or C++? > > > Sander > > .sigless > >
Hello I think some people forget the main goal of this thread: "should we include LAT in GNOME for release 2.18 ?" Before any language debate, we should focus on why LAT should or shouldn't be included in GNOME. (specially because the language debate for Mono is over, and I'm not a pro mono guy). For me, I would say No, as don't see really a reason to include LAT in GNOME, because administrating LDAP is not a common task. Even if we consider the Administrator platform (pessulus, sabayon), these tools are for administrating GNOME desktop, and not for general administration. Thanks for attention. -- Baptiste Mille-Mathias Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés (merci vuntz) _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
