<snip> > Hello > > I think some people forget the main goal of this thread: "should we > include LAT in GNOME for release 2.18 ?" > Before any language debate, we should focus on why LAT should or > shouldn't be included in GNOME. (specially because the language debate > for Mono is over, and I'm not a pro mono guy). > > For me, I would say No, as don't see really a reason to include LAT in > GNOME, because administrating LDAP is not a common task. Even if we > consider the Administrator platform (pessulus, sabayon), these tools > are for administrating GNOME desktop, and not for general > administration.
Administrating LDAP = administrating computer (of which, there are more desktops than servers) = administrating GNOME. Ask Jorge Castro (whiprush) or any of the other people who deploy GNOME in a corporate environment about this. Having a good set of tools for this task is something GNOME has been lacking for awhile. This is why the admin suite was created in the first place. Corey _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
