On 9/23/07, Jason D. Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/23/07, Sean Kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think GIT is not a very user friendly SCM for those coming from > > other version control systems. It is far too rough around the edges. > > Will it get better? I am sure over time it will. But I certainly > > wouldn't impose it on the multitude of Gnome developers who have > > varying degress of SCM experience from the git go. :-) > > > I'm a little skeptical that your experience will apply to anyone else > (except perhaps Nokia and Motorola) based on what I know... >
Well, if you have software projects that you create, regardless of whether they are apps or libraries, then that is what I am speaking to. I need an application that do a certain function for a product and that leads to a whole slew of completely new software. This is the where most of the SCM work that deals on a day to day basis with a version control system. If you want to learn more about how companies build embedded software for projects based on the multitude of elements that make up a root filesystem, then you might read up on Scratchbox, OpenEmbedded, or Poky. I am speaking to the former, not the latter which falls under the scope of what I define as more package management to whatever packaging system you are using. It involves very little work with version control. Sean > _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
