I read your message three time but I still can't figure out if you're for or against Empathy in Gnome.
On 9/23/07, Andrew Cowie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2007-09-23 at 17:07 -0500, Jason D. Clinton wrote: > > > See my other reply regarding Pidgin's de facto status as the Gnome > > desktop IM client. > > Being a part of GNOME is not just writing an app that happens to use GTK > (and don't even talk about the evolution - great way to smash your > addressbook). The fact that it is a successful, widely used program > doesn't come into it. It's not a GNOME program (in all the meanings that > that has, the least of which is has it actually been accepted into > GNOME!) and doesn't want to be. > > So fine. If one or three other groups want to work on capabilities that > _will_ integrate properly with the GNOME desktop and allow other apps to > use it, then all the better. > > > AfC > Sydney > > > -- > Andrew Frederick Cowie > > We are an operations engineering consultancy focusing on strategy, > organizational architecture, systems review, and change management > procedures: enabling successful use of open source in mission > critical enterprises, worldwide. > > http://www.operationaldynamics.com/ > > Sydney New York Toronto London > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > >
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
