Le dimanche 06 janvier 2008, à 17:33 -0600, Shaun McCance a écrit : > If we want to have an IDE in our devtools release set > (and honestly, what's the point of a devtools release > set without an IDE?), then Anjuta seems like the most > natural choice.
Hmm, yes, it was probably not clear from my summary: Anjuta is really the most natural choice. The question could be: is it ready to go in for 2.22 or should we wait a bit more? > Does Anjuta have (or do the developers plan to have) > glade-like or devhelp-like functionality built in, as > some other IDEs do? This seems like a natural thing > for an *integrated* development environment to do. > If so, does it make sense for us to have stand-alone > applications for that functionality in the devtools > release set, if Anjuta is included? We do want the stand-alone apps for the old coders like us, don't we? I don't think it's only a few coders here and there... (there's integration with glade3 and devhelp in anjuta) > If Anjuta is really hard to translate, and if the > strings could be improved, we could postpone until > 2.24, with the provision that the Anjuta developers > need to work with the translation teams between now > and the 2.24 string freeze to fix this stuff. This > is something that could have probably been addressed > earlier in the release cycle, if somebody had taken > the initiative. Again, the summary was probably a bit misleading. There's also the fact that we don't know if it's good from a usability point of view (which is a hard question for an IDE, I guess). Basically, is it just ready? That's why we'd like to know what people using it think about it. (it would have been great to know the fact that it's hard to translate earlier -- note that there's a GHOP task to help fix this, though) Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
