As I ever ported anjuta to Solaris platform, I'd like to say something here:
1. Anjuta is really helpful and attractive to new developers for Gtk +/GNOME. 2. It does have glade and devhelp built-in. 3. For users who are used to use IDE, anjuta is first choice under GNOME environment. Although we have SunStudio, eclipse, etc. Thanks, Halton. On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 00:57 +0100, Cosimo Cecchi wrote: > Il giorno dom, 06/01/2008 alle 23.47 +0100, Vincent Untz ha scritto: > > > If you use anjuta, speak up. If you have tried anjuta, speak up. If the > > name anjuta makes you feel something, speak up. If you want to be the > > next big movie star, speak up. Now. > > Hi, as a new contributor to the GNOME project, I must say that I'm all > for the inclusion of Anjuta into the platform, as that, together with > Devhelp, are the tools that made easier for me to start writing patches > and code. > I used Anjuta for quite a long time now and I've seen many progress in > its development. I'm not following SVN, but I'm using the "unstable" > releases and I've rarely seen a crash or strange behaviour. Devhelp and > Glade integration are already there and work great, and I recently read > [1] that new features are coming in too. > What I miss is a better autocompletion support when using GtkSourceView, > which has some minor flaws, and support for git and "modern" VCS other > than CVS and SVN. > So, all in all it's a big +1 for me. > > [1] - > http://blogs.gnome.org/johannes/2008/01/05/gtksourceview-21-in-anjuta/ > > Regards, > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
