On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Lennart Poettering <mzta...@0pointer.de> wrote: > Oh, is that so? > > This is some old Topaz mockup: > > http://farm1.static.flickr.com/20/70003494_668cfdc0dd.jpg
Your attitude is making it really hard to take sides with PA. Yes, it's *the* only way forward at the moment. But you don't need to be a dick about it. Why are you (and your supporters) resisting a fall back mode so strongly? BTW, I updated the proposal pages some time ago to indicate that PA is essentially being proposed as a dependency as a result of this thread. What about your attitude toward hardware compatibility lends to the argument that we *should* depend on PA at this point? _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
