2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Florian Müllner <fmuell...@gnome.org> > wrote: > > 2011/8/1 Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> > >> > >> Yes, but if a significant percentage of the people answer "not at > >> all", or "somewhat", then the survey would be a bit wasted, since now > >> you have to wait another year to ask in more detail. > > > > Of course the same argument applies if a significant percentage of people > > feels that GNOME has "too few" configuration options. > > Indeed, which is why I say the question is not biased. Results can go > one way or the other. >
Huh? How does the fact that a request to "add more options" is meaningless without specifying which options are (supposedly) missing have anything to do with the original question being biased? Florian
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
