-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 26/04/12 18:16, Luca Ferretti wrote: > > While our design/ux team is able to produce great ideas, > frequently the only visible product of design work is a wiki page > with poor info. Or, at least, poor compared with documents and info > provided by others. You can compare, for instance, our document > about proposed changes for unlock screen [1] or initial setup [2] > with a similar document from Canonical about changes for multiple > monitor stuff[3].
IMHO, that's mainly because Canonical, like e.g. Mozilla, have more design resources focused on a smaller set of problems. This allows them to spend time documenting in more detail, conducting user testing of design proposals before they are published, researching in detail how their solutions are actually being used, etc. Felipe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+Z2DAACgkQ3e5RNKzod9eWPQCgwi7aiIJjWdkhn35v7+tXanjY VxMAoLvlUJfYfjd35xnEKG8wSLYFUFwi =LK34 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
