On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 1:43 PM, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org> wrote: > Should we go ahead then? Sri, let's go with #gnome and #engagement for now? > If the bridge works out well, we can move more channels to it soon.
As Matthew said: > There may be some confusion here about the dynamics of Matrix bridging. In > practice, when bridging to IRC, Matrix just acts as a big decentralised IRC > bouncer. It connects on a per-network, not a per-channel basis, and the > Matrix users who pop up on IRC look and feel like a normal IRC client > connection... because they are. It just happens to be that the client is > running on a Matrix/IRC bridge and syncing that user's history into Matrix > for them. So we don't have to/can't choose channels that are bridged. Not in a whitelist fashion. We can however mark specific channels as private (for those with sensitive discussions). Matthew, anything blocking the bridging on our side? -- Alexandre Franke GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list