We definitely need such an adapter interface. This will allow us to
not corrupt the target instance, e.g. a minimal server, by installing
openejb.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I think we are kind of caught in a catch 22 here...
>
> The issue is, the server is pluggable for the most part. People
> may/may
> not want EJB, but definitely want the management capabilities.
>
> Whats your thought on an adapter interface that provides for full
> JSR-77
> compatibility, thus requiring EJB, or a switch that allows for pure
> JMX
> remoting? This would allow for compliance or be able to leverage the
> management without EJB if so desired.
>
> Thoughts?
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
