So I think we are kind of caught in a catch 22 here... The issue is, the server is pluggable for the most part. People may/may not want EJB, but definitely want the management capabilities.
Whats your thought on an adapter interface that provides for full JSR-77 compatibility, thus requiring EJB, or a switch that allows for pure JMX remoting? This would allow for compliance or be able to leverage the management without EJB if so desired. Thoughts? Viet Nguyen wrote: > Yes, with the current implementation we have, OpenEJB is a > prerequisite. JMX is a good solution too, but I wanted to follow the > JSR 77 spec, which tells us to communicate with the server through the > usage of MEJB, which is why OpenEJB is needed in this case. > > --Viet
