On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:Nope....other than I couldn't think of any reason why it needed to be included either.Rick, Is there any reason to not include this fix in branches/2.1 as well?
IMO, it should be merged into 2.1 and 2.0 for that matter. --kevan
