Kevan Miller wrote:

On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:

Joe Bohn wrote:

Rick,

Is there any reason to not include this fix in branches/2.1 as well?
Nope....other than I couldn't think of any reason why it needed to be included either.

IMO, it should be merged into 2.1 and 2.0 for that matter.
Oops, it looks like I was mistaken...it was just specified in a much different manner in 2.0.

Rick


--kevan



Reply via email to