Kevan Miller wrote:

On Jun 3, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:

Joe Bohn wrote:

Rick,

Is there any reason to not include this fix in branches/2.1 as well?
Nope....other than I couldn't think of any reason why it needed to be included either.

IMO, it should be merged into 2.1 and 2.0 for that matter.
Well, I think I disagree with merging it into 2.0...the PortOffset value didn't even exist back that far!

Rick


--kevan



Reply via email to