I'm inclined to agree also, but I'm wondering how long of a delay we'd be looking at. A weekish?
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > >> The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. CXF has >> a fix that is currently included in 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT. If we give them the >> green light they will push a release soon. >> >> At this point I'm trying to decide the best course of action. If you have >> an opinion please speak up: >> >> 1) Delay a 2.1.2 release until we verify CXF 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT with the tck >> and get a CXF 2.0.8 release >> 2) Revert back to cxf 2.0.2-incubator that we shipped with in Geronimo >> 2.1.1 >> 3) Revert to CXF 2.0.5 which should work and not have the problem that >> just discovered. We would have to verify this. >> >> >> I'm currently building new images to verify cxf 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT for #1. At >> the moment I'm thinking this is our best option. If there are problems I'll >> attempt #3. #2 would be the quickest path to a release but IMO is the least >> desirable. >> > > I agree. > > --kevan > -- ~Jason Warner
