Jason Warner wrote:
I'm inclined to agree also, but I'm wondering how long of a delay we'd be looking at. A weekish?
It will probably be close to a week from our original target which was yesterday. If everything works like clockwork we could branch as soon as Friday.
Joe
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. <http://2.0.6.> CXF has a fix that is currently included in 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT. If we give them the green light they will push a release soon. At this point I'm trying to decide the best course of action. If you have an opinion please speak up: 1) Delay a 2.1.2 release until we verify CXF 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT with the tck and get a CXF 2.0.8 release 2) Revert back to cxf 2.0.2-incubator that we shipped with in Geronimo 2.1.1 3) Revert to CXF 2.0.5 which should work and not have the problem that just discovered. We would have to verify this. I'm currently building new images to verify cxf 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT for #1. At the moment I'm thinking this is our best option. If there are problems I'll attempt #3. #2 would be the quickest path to a release but IMO is the least desirable. I agree. --kevan -- ~Jason Warner
