Joe Bohn wrote:
Jason Warner wrote:
I'm inclined to agree also, but I'm wondering how long of a delay we'd
be looking at. A weekish?
It will probably be close to a week from our original target which was
yesterday. If everything works like clockwork we could branch as soon
as Friday.
Joe
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6.
<http://2.0.6.> CXF has a fix that is currently included in
2.0.8-SNAPSHOT. If we give them the green light they will push
a release soon.
At this point I'm trying to decide the best course of action.
If you have an opinion please speak up:
1) Delay a 2.1.2 release until we verify CXF 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT
with the tck and get a CXF 2.0.8 release
2) Revert back to cxf 2.0.2-incubator that we shipped with in
Geronimo 2.1.1
3) Revert to CXF 2.0.5 which should work and not have the
problem that just discovered. We would have to verify this.
I'm currently building new images to verify cxf 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT
for #1. At the moment I'm thinking this is our best option. If
there are problems I'll attempt #3. #2 would be the quickest
path to a release but IMO is the least desirable.
I agree.
--kevan
--
~Jason Warner
+1 to moving forward - especially since it sounds like they are so close.
Jay
