You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE. We had several instances of the "JEE" usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminded of the correct naming by one of our PMC members who works for Sun :-)
For distribution names (like zip and plugin filenames) I agree that we need to come up with a consistent naming scheme that is compatible with the Sun guidelines. BUT, in the source code, I would argue we can use "jee" all we want, as they are internal variables/attribute names. -Donald On 1/29/10 3:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote: > I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe "javaee" or "ee". > > -Jack > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Good idea if following concerns are addressed: > > 1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan. > 2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change. > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > hi, > > I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee" in our new > Geronimo. > There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin > project names, artifact names, "j2eeType"... > So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee? > > Any thoughts? > > > -- > Lei Wang (Rex) > rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org> > > > > > -- > Shawn > >
