Thanks, will use "javaee". -Rex
2010/1/29 Donald Woods <[email protected]> > You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE. We had several instances of the > "JEE" usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminded of > the correct naming by one of our PMC members who works for Sun :-) > > For distribution names (like zip and plugin filenames) I agree that we > need to come up with a consistent naming scheme that is compatible with > the Sun guidelines. > > BUT, in the source code, I would argue we can use "jee" all we want, as > they are internal variables/attribute names. > > > -Donald > > > On 1/29/10 3:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote: > > I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe "javaee" or > "ee". > > > > -Jack > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Good idea if following concerns are addressed: > > > > 1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan. > > 2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee" in our new > > Geronimo. > > There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin > > project names, artifact names, "j2eeType"... > > So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee? > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > Lei Wang (Rex) > > rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org> > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Shawn > > > > > -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org
