Hi, Rex
Currently, I am working on moving to javaee 6 xmlbeans, if possible,
could you please do the changes after I finish it ?
Thanks !
2010/2/1 Rex Wang <[email protected]>
> Thanks, will use "javaee".
>
> -Rex
>
> 2010/1/29 Donald Woods <[email protected]>
>
> You cannot use JEE to refer to Java EE. We had several instances of the
>> "JEE" usage on our OpenJPA website/docs and were politely reminded of
>> the correct naming by one of our PMC members who works for Sun :-)
>>
>> For distribution names (like zip and plugin filenames) I agree that we
>> need to come up with a consistent naming scheme that is compatible with
>> the Sun guidelines.
>>
>> BUT, in the source code, I would argue we can use "jee" all we want, as
>> they are internal variables/attribute names.
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>>
>> On 1/29/10 3:00 AM, Jack Cai wrote:
>> > I remember that "jee" is not a good abbreviation. So maybe "javaee" or
>> "ee".
>> >
>> > -Jack
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Shawn Jiang <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Good idea if following concerns are addressed:
>> >
>> > 1, This might break some user's existing deployment plan.
>> > 2, Doc and Example need update as well after such a change.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Rex Wang <[email protected]
>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> >
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > I think it is a good time to stop calling "j2ee" in our new
>> > Geronimo.
>> > There are a lot of places using this term, such as plugin
>> > project names, artifact names, "j2eeType"...
>> > So which one is more appropriate, javaee or jee?
>> >
>> > Any thoughts?
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lei Wang (Rex)
>> > rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Shawn
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>
--
Ivan
