On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote: > ant elder wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> As I recall these were removed from 1.5.1 because of TUSCANY-3165. >>> This problem appears to be fixed in OpenEJB 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT (see [1]), >>> and the OpenEJB folks have indicated their willingness to produce a >>> 3.0.2 release if we need it (see [2]). >>> >>> As we are planning to release the travel sample as an add-on to 1.6 >>> (see [3]), we need to make sure that all the necessary dependencies are >>> included in the 1.6 binary distro. I have opened TUSCANY-3437 to >>> track this issue. >>> >> >> Just as a reminder - we're also doing this release for a user who >> needs it and we promised we'd get it out by this month. >> >> ...ant >> >> > If there isn't time to get an Open EJB-3.0.2 release, perhaps we could > use OpenEJB 3.0.2-SNAPSHOT for 1.6. If/when there is an OpenEJB 3.0.2 > release, we could do a new Tuscany release (1.6.1?) based on that. > > I understand that snapshot dependencies aren't usually a good thing, > but in this case there are unlikely to be further snapshot releases > of OpenEJB 3.0.2 so the risk seems very low. > > Simon >
Does OpenEJB 3.1.2 [1] have the required fix ? If so, would it be hard to migrate to use it ? [1] http://openejb.apache.org/download.html -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
