I disagree here - that'd be like unsetting the tracking flag for a Firefox release instead of contacting somebody to clarify why it was tracked in the first place (we lose data/urgency, at least temporarily). There needs to be something in addition to the priority flag to accomplish the same thing, which is why I suggested needinfo.
-Alex On Oct 12, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Justin Lebar <[email protected]> wrote: >> In general: cc Someone With Power (e.g. akeybl or cjones) and explain >> why you think the bug should be re-prioritized. >> >> Sometimes, you can unset the priority field to indicate that you'd >> like it re-prioritized. I don't know if we're doing that here. > > I think that people should feel free to unset the priority field to > get something reprioritized, and of course include some arguments as > to why you think the priority is wrong and what you think it should > be. That way it's sure to be picked up by drivers on the next triage. > > In general, mozilla isn't very manager driven, so people should always > feel free to speak up if they feel that something is marked wrong. And > resetting bugzilla fields is a good way to get attention. > > / Jonas > _______________________________________________ > dev-b2g mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
