> WebUSB and WebBluetooth both look very promising. I suppose one benefit of > using USB in a project would be to charge the phone while it is being used. > If you are making a smartphone powered robot for example(like Romo), then > using the USB would make sense. Also, bluetooth from my experience can > sometimes be unreliable and that could be an issue with some real time > applications. On the other hand, the ease of use of bluetooth would be very > appealing to beginner level hardware hackers.
I also think the same way — I am using a system in Android with BT connectivity and it goes bad in scenarios that relates to real-time — such as when the web app is trying to show or gather the stream of data from the external system apparatus — think of a beer brew system apparatus. If turns out BT is easier, I would probably hack the script to relaunch itself and have hard coded passwords and so on — not much different of the approach which I think WPA supplicant / network management apps do in Linux with WIFI. m > > Can't wait for these API's to get ready. I'm planning to build a smartphone > powered UAV in the summer. It would be great if I could use a firefox OS > phone! > _______________________________________________ > dev-b2g mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g -- www.telasocial.com _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
