Super, thanks! On 20 Jan 2014, at 09:21, Chris AtLee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Chris, > > This shouldn't require any changes to developers' build process. It should > make it easier to reproduce the builds that happen as part of our automation > though! > > Cheers, > Chris > > On 17:02, Fri, 17 Jan, Chris Mills wrote: >> Does this change mean any changes are needed to the B2G build process? I’m >> just wondering if I need to update any of the Build instructions on MDN. >> >> Chris Mills >> Senior tech writer || Mozilla >> developer.mozilla.org || MDN >> [email protected] || @chrisdavidmills >> >> On 17 Jan 2014, at 07:58, Chris AtLee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Yesterday we switched how B2G device builds on the trunk trees [1] get >>> built. >>> >>> We are keeping copies of each device's manifest up-to-date in the tree will >>> the revisions for each project fully specified. e.g. >>> https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/file/fa8e7793c44b/b2g/config/mako/sources.xml >>> >>> In the background, we have tools running that checkout the b2g-manifests >>> repo, and then for each device load the official upstream manifest, follow >>> all the includes, and resolve all revision references in the manifest to >>> absolute commit ids, and then land those into gecko. >>> >>> This will be a big help to sheriffs, as it pins down the revisions of >>> various b2g repositories used for each gecko change. >>> >>> Please let me know if you see any problems with the builds as a result of >>> this change. Work is being tracked in bug 899969 [2]. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Chris >>> >>> [1] b2g-inbound, mozilla-central, mozilla-inbound, etc. >>> [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899969 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-b2g mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g >> >> _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
