On 6-7-2010 8:23, taco wrote:
sorry for delays in responding ... i'm still in the process of fixing
hardware / installations etc
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
I'm against storing the command definition in the relevant files because
the definitions are meant for documentation and it's nonsense in this way
because you need sometimes references to other commands and who should
you show a command for spacing which is written in a font file.
fyi: long ago it started like that: a \startsetup... definition as part
of the tex files but it was a pain togenerate the lists that way
Well, they could be extracted automatically to a normal
lua file, but you had a good point about the \section etc
later on, so a separate file would probably be better
indeed.
i'm not so sure if i want to abandon the xml file (yet) as theres
nothing wrong with xml per se ... it's no big deal to generate lua from
it if needed (both are as unreadable although with somenamespacing we
could probably share more in lua but at the cost of readablity (and i'm
really sensitive to formating of such files -)
needs more thinking as changes in that area should not happen too often
we can consider splitting up things but as already mentioned it's hard
to come up with a devision based on the tex files ... ok, in due time we
might get more granularity; an option is to make files per block: page,
strc, core, ...
concerning the documentation in the lua files (not that much and
currently in xml) ... it could be just context code as it then permits
embedding examples
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context